between the frequency quantities $\omega$ and $f$), maybe "angle" has as much a right to be a base quantity as "current". POWER Units Conversion joules-per-second to joules-per-minute 1 J/s, 59.999999999999 J/min 2 J/s, 120 J/min 3 J/s, 180 J/min 4 J/s, 240 J/min 5 J/s. But given how it is quite easy to mix up cycles, radians, and degrees (e.g. The only special thing about angles is, that their natural units occur in geometry, without insights into laws of nature. The unit of current is eliminated by saying that two unit charges at rest at a distance of one unit length exert one unit of force on each other by the Coulomb law, which gives the charge a fractional dimension of $\rm (mass)^$. In physics, unit systems with 3 base units for length, time and mass are common, as opposed to the 7 base units of SI. One $\rm meter$ would then be roughly $3.335~\rm nanoseconds$.Īnd indeed similar situations exist. If we argue that there is a natural unit of something, we'd end up not needing units at all For instance we don't need the meter, we can just use light-seconds as the basic unit of length. Ultimately such things come down to conventions. That should be, for constant moment of inertia $I$,īut when you think of angles as a quantity with dimension - in my case angular velocities given in $\rm revolutions~per~minute~(rpm)$, it would be a unit mismatch. and then I ran exactly into this situation: I needed to calculate an angular acceleration from a torque. Example: convert 15 rd/s, rad/s to joule/kilogram/second: 15 rd/s, rad/s 15 × 0.01 joule/kilogram/second 0. I came across this question when doing numerics with the Python package pint, where angles can be specified in $\rm cycles$, $\rm rad$ and $\rm deg$ (and some aliases, such as $\rm turns$, $\rm revolutions$).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |